-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 673
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(tier4_perception_launch): make lanelet object filter optional #1698
feat(tier4_perception_launch): make lanelet object filter optional #1698
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
@kenji-miyake Miyake-san, Could you review or assign an appropriate reviewer to this PR? |
Sure. I think @yukkysaito and @miursh are the right developers to review this. |
...on_launch/launch/object_recognition/detection/camera_lidar_fusion_based_detection.launch.xml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1698 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 10.67% 10.72% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 1107 1105 -2
Lines 78658 78400 -258
Branches 18724 18620 -104
==========================================
+ Hits 8393 8409 +16
+ Misses 61261 61078 -183
+ Partials 9004 8913 -91
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. (I don't confirm to run)
@miursh can you check the code?
@kaancolak In this PR, do you want to change not to use object_lanelet_filter or object_filter itself (including object_position_filter) ? |
...on_launch/launch/object_recognition/detection/camera_lidar_fusion_based_detection.launch.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
c4eebdc
to
737c770
Compare
Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
@miursh Yes, I agree that it makes more sense to control the object filter with an extra parameter. I added and pushed the "use_object_filter" parameter. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…ier4#1698) * feat(tier4_perception_launch): make lanelet object filter optional Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix arg Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix argument var Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): add new parameter Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Co-authored-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
…ier4#1698) * feat(tier4_perception_launch): make lanelet object filter optional Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix arg Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix argument var Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): add new parameter Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Co-authored-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
…ier4#1698) * feat(tier4_perception_launch): make lanelet object filter optional Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix arg Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix argument var Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): add new parameter Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Co-authored-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
…utowarefoundation#1698) * feat(tier4_perception_launch): make lanelet object filter optional Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix arg Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix argument var Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): add new parameter Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Co-authored-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
…ier4#1698) * feat(tier4_perception_launch): make lanelet object filter optional Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix arg Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): fix argument var Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> * feat(tier4_perception_launch): add new parameter Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai> Co-authored-by: Kaan Colak <kcolak@leodrive.ai>
Signed-off-by: Kaan Colak kcolak@leodrive.ai
Description
When working without lanelet/vector map, we don't use any tier4_perception_launch configuration. use_vector_map is a parameter for the base launch files(autoware.launch.xml, logging_simulator.launch.xml) but this parameter doesn't affect "object_lanelet_filter".
Pre-review checklist for the PR author
The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.
In-review checklist for the PR reviewers
The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.
Post-review checklist for the PR author
The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.
After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.